The Court dismissed this writ petition for alternative remedy, holding that grievances involving trespass and harassment on private property must be addressed through civil and criminal proceedings rather than a writ of mandamus.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 34
Case :- WRIT - C No. - 32892 of 2019
Petitioner :- Chinta Devi Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 3 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Bhartendu Pathak Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.
Hon'ble Sudhir Agarwal,J. Hon'ble Rajeev Misra,J.
Order Date :- 17.10.2019 Siddhant Sahu
1 issue framed by the court
Whether a writ petition is maintainable directing the District Magistrate to decide a representation regarding private harassment on petitioner's property given the existence of alternative civil and
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Chinta Devi
State Of U.P.
Hon'ble Sudhir Agarwal,J.
Hon'ble Rajeev Misra,J.
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
