High Court dismissed a called-in-revise writ petition in absence of the petitioner's counsel, considering it infructuous, and vacated any interim order.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 34
Case :- WRIT - C No. - 47612 of 2006
Petitioner :- M/S Auto Point Respondent :- State Of U.P. And Others Counsel for Petitioner :- A.P. Srivastava Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,R.N.Singh,Tarun Varma
Hon'ble Sudhir Agarwal,J. Hon'ble Rajeev Misra,J.
Order Date :- 16.10.2019 AK
M/S Auto Point
State Of U.P.
Sudhir Agarwal
Rajeev Misra
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
