The writ petition was dismissed for want of prosecution as the petitioner failed to appear through counsel to press the matter. The order further vacated the interim order, if any.
Vacation of the interim order, if any.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 1
Case :- WRIT - C No. - 32454 of 2008
Petitioner :- Abdul Mazid Khan Respondent :- State Of U.P. And Others Counsel for Petitioner :- P.K. Kashyap Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,H.P. Dubey,R.L. Verma
Hon'ble Ramesh Sinha,J. Hon'ble Ajit Kumar,J.
List being revised.
None appeared on behalf of the petitioner to press the writ petition.
The writ petition is dismissed for want of prosecution.
Interim order, if any, stands vacated.
Order Date :- 20.8.2019 Nadeem Ahmad
(Ajit Kumar, J.) (Ramesh Sinha,J.)
Abdul Mazid Khan
State Of U.P.
Ramesh Sinha
Ajit Kumar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
