The writ petition filed against the State of U.P. was dismissed as infructuous after the respondent's counsel stated that the impugned order had already been withdrawn by the authority.
The writ petition was dismissed as rendered infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 1
Case :- WRIT - C No. - 30198 of 2019
Petitioner :- Bhuneshwar Prasad And Another Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 4 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Shubham Dwivedi,Bhanu Pratap Singh,Rajesh Kumar Singh Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Girdhar Prasad Tripathi
Hon'ble Ramesh Sinha,J. Hon'ble Ajit Kumar,J.
Shri R. K. Singh, learned counsel for the petitioner is present.
Shri G.P. Tripathi, learned counsel appearing on behalf of respondent nos. 2 and 3 has stated that the impugned order under challenge in the present writ petition has already been withdrawn by the authority concerned.
In view of the statement made by learned counsel for the respondent nos. 2 and 3, the present writ petition is dismissed as rendered infructuous, consigned to records.
Order Date :- 20.9.2019 Ravi Prakash
(Ajit Kumar, J.) (Ramesh Sinha, J.)
Bhuneshwar Prasad And Another
State Of U.P.
Ramesh Sinha
Ajit Kumar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
