A writ petition was withdrawn by the petitioner with liberty to file a fresh one; the court dismissed the petition accordingly.
Writ petition dismissed with liberty to file a fresh one.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 1
Case :- WRIT - C No. - 30162 of 2019
Petitioner :- Anilesh Raj Respondent :- Rajya Vidyut Utpadan Nigam Uttar Pradesh Lucknow And 3 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Puneet Bhadauria Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Shashi Shankar Tripathi,A/S0511
Hon'ble Ramesh Sinha,J. Hon'ble Ajit Kumar,J.
Heard Sri Puneet Bhadauria, learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Standing Counsel for the State-respondents.
At the very outset, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that there is some defect in this writ petition and prayed that the writ petition may be dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to file a fresh one.
The writ petition is, accordingly, dismissed with the aforesaid liberty.
Order Date :- 20.9.2019 Ravi Prakash
(Ajit Kumar, J.) (Ramesh Sinha, J.)
Anilesh Raj
Rajya Vidyut Utpadan Nigam Uttar Pradesh Lucknow
Ramesh Sinha
Ajit Kumar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
