Petitioner's writ petition dismissed as not pressed with liberty to challenge new notices. No substantive issues decided.
None granted; petition dismissed as not pressed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 1
Case :- WRIT - C No. - 30181 of 2019
Petitioner :- M/S Bharat Auto Service Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 3 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Brijesh Kumar Pandey Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Anand Tiwari
Hon'ble Ramesh Sinha,J. Hon'ble Ajit Kumar,J.
Sri Prakash Pandey, learned Advocate holding brief of Sri B.K. Pandey learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri Anand Tiwari, learned counsel appearing for respondents no. 2 and 3 are present.
Learned counsel for the petitioner states that the petition may be dismissed as not pressed with the liberty to challenge some new notices issued by the respondents.
In view of the above the writ petition is dismissed as not pressed with the aforesaid liberty.
Order Date :- 25.11.2019 Nadeem Ahmad
(Ajit Kumar,J.) (Ramesh Sinha,J.)
M/S Bharat Auto Service
State Of U.P.
Other 1
Other 2
Other 3
Ramesh Sinha
Ajit Kumar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
