The writ petitioner failed to appear despite a peremptory listing. TheHon'ble Court dismissed the petition in default.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 11
Case :- WRIT - C No. - 28402 of 2013
Petitioner :- Natthu Lal Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 3 Ors. Counsel for Petitioner :- Awadhesh Kumar Sharma Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Mahesh Narain Singh
Hon'ble Pankaj Bhatia,J.
No one appears in the revised call, despite the fact that the matter is listed peremptorily.
Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed in default.
Order Date :- 1.3.2019 SR
Natthu Lal
State Of U.P.
3 Ors.
Pankaj Bhatia
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
