Writ petition dismissed in default as no one appeared on the revised call or earlier date to press the matter, and cause of action may not survive.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 11
Case :- WRIT - C No. - 28057 of 2013
Petitioner :- Rajveer Singh Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 3 Ors. Counsel for Petitioner :- S.K. Mishra Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Anuj Kumar
Hon'ble Pankaj Bhatia,J.
No one appears in the revised call. On the earlier date on 15.02.2019 also, no one appeared to press this writ petition.
It appears that the cause of action does not survives or the petitioner is not interested to pursue the writ petition.
Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed in default.
Order Date :- 1.3.2019 SR
Rajveer Singh
State Of U.P.
Pankaj Bhatia
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
