The High Court dismissed a writ petition under Article 226 seeking mandamus to restrain private respondents from interfering in the petitioner's possession of disputed land. The court held the dispute is private and barred writ jurisdiction, directing an injunction remedy.
Writ petition dismissed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 34
Case :- WRIT - C No. - 27796 of 2019
Petitioner :- Ram Lalloo Dubey And Another Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 6 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Mahendra Prasad Mishra Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.
Hon'ble Sudhir Agarwal,J. Hon'ble Rajeev Misra,J.
Order Date :- 16.9.2019 YK
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the High Court can issue a writ of mandamus to stop police or Collector from interfering in a dispute over peaceful possession of land.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Ram Lalloo Dubey And Another
State Of U.P.
6 Others
Sudhir Agarwal
Rajeev Misra
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
