This court dismissed a writ petition. It ruled that seeking a mandate to restrain demolition and possession is a matter for common law, making this writ petition not maintainable.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 34
Case :- WRIT - C No. - 26702 of 2019
Petitioner :- Veer Singh Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 3 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Mohd. Aslam Khan Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Arun Kumar Srivastava
Hon'ble Sudhir Agarwal,J. Hon'ble Rajeev Misra,J.
“ (A) Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding and directing to the respondent not to demolish the house of the petitioner situated in village Bahpura Tehsil and District Rampur.
(B) Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding and directing the respondent no. 2 to decide the representation dated 12.7.2019 in accordance with law.”
Order Date :- 16.9.2019 PS
1 issue framed by the court
Whether writ petition for restraining demolition and restraining possession/raising construction on land is maintainable.
Veer Singh
State Of U.P.
3 Others
Sudhir Agarwal
Rajeev Misra
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
