The High Court disposed of a writ petition concerning an arm license application based on the Standing Counsel's statement without a hearing. No merits were examined. Disposed of on 17.8.2019.
The petition is disposed of based on the statement of the Standing Counsel without going into merits.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 6
Case :- WRIT - C No. - 27129 of 2019
Petitioner :- Arvind Kumar Yadav Respondent :- State Of U.P. And Another Counsel for Petitioner :- Suraj Kumar Singh Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.
Hon'ble Yashwant Varma,J.
Although Sri Birendra Pratap Singh learned Standing Counsel is present, none has appeared for the petitioner.
Although the application stated to have been made for grant of an arm licence has not been brought on the record, in paragraph-3 however the file number pertaining to the application has been mentioned.
Learned Standing Counsel appearing for the second respondent states that subject to verification of all facts, the application as made by the petitioner for grant of an arm license shall be duly evaluated and disposed of in accordance with law and preferably within a period of four months from the date of presentation of a certified copy of this order.
Accordingly and without going into the merits of the claim of the petitioner, this petition shall stand disposed of in light of the statement noted above.
Order Date :- 17.8.2019 faraz
Arvind Kumar Yadav
State Of U.P.
Another
Yashwant Varma
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
