The petitioner discharged the writ petition as infructuous. The order also vacated any interim order that may have been granted.
The petition was dismissed as infructuous and interim order, if any, was vacated.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 1
Case :- WRIT - C No. - 24897 of 2019
Petitioner :- Kamlesh Kumar Dwivedi Respondent :- Union Of India And 3 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Rajesh Kumar Dubey,Yogendra Kumar Counsel for Respondent :- A.S.G.I.,Swetashwa Agarwal,Vikash Budhwar,Yogendra Kumar
Hon'ble Ramesh Sinha,J. Hon'ble Ajit Kumar,J.
Sri Rajesh Kumar Dubey, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner states that the present petition has become infructuous. Sri Rahul Malviya, learned Standing Counsel for the State is present.
Accordingly, the petition is dismissed as infructuous.
Interim order, if any, is vacated.
(Ajit Kumar, J.) (Ramesh Sinha, J.)
Order Date :- 14.11.2019 Shiraz
Kamlesh Kumar Dwivedi
Union Of India
Ramesh Sinha
Ajit Kumar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
