The High Court disposed of the writ petition seeking intervention in the petitioners' marriage, finding the petitioner major at the time of voluntary marriage. The court directed respondents not to interfere with their peaceful matrimonial life.
Respondents directed not to interfere with the peaceful matrimonial life of the petitioners.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 37
Case :- WRIT - C No. - 20515 of 2019
Petitioner :- Smt. Rashmi And Another Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 3 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Sanjay Mishra Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.
Hon'ble Ram Surat Ram (Maurya),J. Hon'ble Piyush Agrawal,J.
Heard Shri Sanjay Mishra, learned counsel for the petitioners and learned standing counsel for the State of U.P.
Petitioner no. 1 (Smt. Rashmi) appears before the Court. She claims to be major and has filed her High School marksheet showing her date-of-birth as 06.07.1998. She states that she voluntarily married to petitioner no. 2.
In view of the statement of Smt. Rashmi (the petitioner no. 1), this writ petition is disposed of with a direction to the respondents not to interfere with the peaceful matrimonial life of the petitioners.
Order Date :- 26.6.2019 Amit Mishra
1 issue framed by the court
Whether to disturb the peaceful matrimonial life of the petitioners.
Smt. Rashmi
No. 2 Petitioner
State Of U.P.
Other Respondents
Ram Surat Ram (Maurya)
Piyush Agrawal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
