The High Court of Allahabad dismissed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for lack of appearance by the petitioner to press the matter.
The petition is dismissed for want of prosecution. Interim order, if any, is vacated.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 1
Case :- WRIT - C No. - 19933 of 2009
Petitioner :- Laxman Prasad Respondent :- State Of U.P. And Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Mahtab Alam Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.
Hon'ble Ramesh Sinha,J. Hon'ble Ajit Kumar,J.
Case called out in the revised list. No one is present on behalf of the petitioner to press this petition.
Dr. D. K. Tiwari, learned Additional Chief Standing Counsel for the State is present.
Accordingly, the present petition is dismissed for want of prosecution.
Interim order, if any, stands vacated.
Order Date :- 27.9.2019 Nitin Verma
(Ajit Kumar, J.) (Ramesh Sinha, J.)
Laxman Prasad
State Of U.P.
Ramesh Sinha
Ajit Kumar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
