Writ petition dismissed for want of prosecution as no representative of the petitioner appeared despite notice. Interim order, if any, was vacated. No substantive law was applied.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 1
Case :- WRIT - C No. - 19205 of 2008
Petitioner :- Anjani Kumar Mishra Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru Secy Panchayat Raj And Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Madhur Prakash,Rajesh Singh,Veer Singh Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,S.C. Tiwari
Hon'ble Ramesh Sinha,J. Hon'ble Ajit Kumar,J.
List is being revised. Nobody is present on behalf of the petitioner to press the present writ petition. However, Dr. D.K.Tiwari, learned Additional Chief Standing Counsel for the State is present.
The writ petition is accordingly dismissed for want of prosecution.
Interim order, if any, stands vacated.
Order Date :- 17.9.2019 Sanjeev
(Ajit Kumar,J.) (Ramesh Sinha,J.)
Anjani Kumar Mishra
State Of U.P. Thru Secy Panchayat Raj And Others
Ramesh Sinha
Ajit Kumar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
