The writ petition was dismissed for want of instructions. Any interim order, if any, was vacated.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 26
Case :- WRIT - C No. - 16094 of 2014
Petitioner :- Sudhir Kumar And 7 Ors. Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 3 Ors. Counsel for Petitioner :- Mahipal Singh Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Arun Kumar Srivastava
Hon'ble Pankaj Bhatia,J.
Learned counsel for the petitioners states that the clients are not responding. It appears that they are not interested in perusing the matter.
The writ petition is dismissed for want of instructions.
Interim order, if any, stands vacated.
Order Date :- 8.5.2019 SR
Sudhir Kumar And 7 Ors.
State Of U.P. And 3 Ors.
Pankaj Bhatia
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
