This one-line order dismisses a writ petition that neither side pressed, citing lack of seriousness from the petitioner.
Writ petition dismissed for want of prosecution.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 26
Case :- WRIT - C No. - 10187 of 2014
Petitioner :- Vimal Kumar And 3 Ors. Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 7 Ors Counsel for Petitioner :- Rajeev Sisodia,Shashan Kumar Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Arun K. Srivastava
Hon'ble Pankaj Bhatia,J.
No one appears to press the writ petition in the revised call and even the rejoinder affidavit is not on the record.
This Court on 11.03.2019 had adjourned the matter in the interest of justice despite no one appearing on the said date also. It appears that petitioners are not serious to prosecute the petition.
The writ petition is dismissed for want of prosecution.
Interim order, if any, stands vacated.
Order Date :- 8.5.2019 SR
Vimal Kumar And 3 Ors.
State Of U.P. And 7 Ors
Pankaj Bhatia
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
