Petitioner filed a writ petition mandamus for directing respondent to decide a pending pension representation. Court dismissed the petition at this stage due to incomplete facts.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 32
Case :- WRIT - C No. - 15563 of 2019
Petitioner :- Tara Devi Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 4 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Sheshavatar Mishra Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.
Hon'ble Shashi Kant Gupta,J. Hon'ble Pankaj Bhatia,J.
This writ petition has been filed, inter alia , for the following relief:
"Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding and directing the respondent no. 3 to decide the claim of the petitioner regarding to the representation/application dated 8.9.2017, (Annexure no. 3) which is pending before him."
From perusal of the writ petition, it transpires that this writ petition has been filed on incomplete set of facts, as such this court has no option but to dismiss this writ petition at this stage.
In view of the above, the writ petition stands dismissed at this stage.
Order Date :- 6.5.2019 MLK
Tara Devi
State Of U.P.
Shashi Kant Gupta
Pankaj Bhatia
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
