In a revision calling for perusal of the record, the Court held that a writ petition filed by a complainant in an inquiry terminated against a notary is not maintainable as a complainant cannot be a party to the lis.
The writ petition was dismissed as not maintainable.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 34
Case :- WRIT - C No. - 10645 of 2017
Petitioner :- Santosh Singh And Another Respondent :- State Of U.P. And Another Counsel for Petitioner :- Manoj Kumar Pandey Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Ramesh Chandra
Hon'ble Sudhir Agarwal,J. Hon'ble Rajendra Kumar-IV,J.
1 issue framed by the court
Whether a writ petition filed by a complainant in an inquiry terminated from the State is maintainable.
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Amin Khan Vs. State of U.P.Referred¶7
Amin Khan Vs. State of U.P. 2008 (2) AWC 2002
Guru Prasad Yadav Vs. State of U.P.Referred¶8
Special Appeal No. 382 of 2008 (Guru Prasad Yadav Vs. State of U.P. & others)
Shravan Kumar Chauhan Vs. State of U.P.Referred¶8
Writ Petition No. 18839 of 2008 (Shravan Kumar Chauhan Vs. State of U.P.)
Santosh Singh
State Of U.P.
Sudhir Agarwal
Rajendra Kumar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
