A writ petition challenging a dispute between private parties involving a bank's loan recovery. The court held the writ petition is not maintainable as it does not involve the State or lie in public interest, and was dismissed.
No relief granted; writ petition dismissed on maintainability grounds.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 34
Case :- WRIT - C No. - 6408 of 2019
Petitioner :- Akhilesh Kumar Pandey Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 2 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Sanjay Rajpoot Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.
Hon'ble Sudhir Agarwal,J. Hon'ble Rajendra Kumar-IV,J.
Order Date :- 26.2.2019 I.A.Siddiqui
1 issue framed by the court
Whether writ jurisdiction is maintainable in a dispute between two private parties regarding loan recovery.
Akhilesh Kumar Pandey
State Of U.P.
Indusind Bank Limited
Sudhir Agarwal
Rajendra Kumar-IV
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
