The High Court dismissed a Writ Petition challenging the order of the licensing authority under the Arms Act. The Court held that the petitioner has an alternative remedy under Section 18 to file an appeal before the Commissioner.
The writ petition was dismissed on the ground of alternative remedy available under Section 18 of the Arms Act.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 28
Case :- WRIT - C No. - 10270 of 2019
Petitioner :- Vipin Pal Singh Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 2 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Girish Tiwari Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.
Hon'ble Rohit Ranjan Agarwal,J.
Heard Shri Girish Tiwari, learned counsel for petitioner and learned Standing counsel for respondents.
Petitioner has challenged the order of licencing authority dated 1302.2019 passed under Section 17(3) of the Arms Act.
The petitioner has an alternative remedy under Section 18, for filing an appeal before the Commissioner.
The writ petition is dismissed on the ground of alternative remedy.
Order Date :- 28.3.2019 A.N. Mishra
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the writ petition challenging the non-issuance of licence under Section 17(3) should be dismissed on the ground of alternative remedy available under Section 18.
2 provisions across 1 enactments
Vipin Pal Singh
State Of U.P.
2 Others
Rohit Ranjan Agarwal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
