Petitioner sought expeditious disposal of a firearm license application. Disposing the writ petition, the court ruled no separate order was needed as per a prior 2016 judgment, directing licensing authorities to act accordingly.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 28
Case :- WRIT - C No. - 10174 of 2019
Petitioner :- Sachin Awasthi Respondent :- State Of U.P. And Another Counsel for Petitioner :- Vivek Kumar Singh Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.
Hon'ble Rohit Ranjan Agarwal,J.
Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Standing counsel for the respondents.
The relief claimed in this writ petition is for expeditious disposal of the application for grant of firearm license.
In view of judgment and order dated 30.3.2016 passed in Writ Petition No. 13821 of 2016 (Masood Ahmad Vs. State of U.P. and others) there is no need for any separate and further order and the writ petition is disposed of in the same terms and conditions.
The Licensing Authorities/District Magistrates shall act accordingly.
Order Date :- 28.3.2019 AKJ
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Masood Ahmad Vs. State of U.P. and othersFollowed¶7
Writ Petition No. 13821 of 2016 (Masood Ahmad Vs. State of U.P. and others)
Sachin Awasthi
State Of U.P.
Another
Rohit Ranjan Agarwal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
