In a default proceeding where no one appeared on behalf of the petitioner, the Court dismissed the writ petition and vacated any interim order.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 22
Case :- WRIT - B No. - 4075 of 1982
Petitioner :- Smt. Sohanwati Respondent :- D.D.C. And Others Counsel for Petitioner :- B.D. Tripathi Counsel for Respondent :- M.S. Joshi,Sanjay Goswami
Hon'ble Salil Kumar Rai,J.
List has been revised. No one appears on behalf of the petitioner.
Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed in default.
Interim order, if any, stands vacated.
Order Date :- 23.1.2019 Anurag/-
Smt. Sohanwati
D.D.C.
Salil Kumar Rai
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
