Phirtoo v. Dy D.C.
Case brief
What is this about?
Writ petition dismissed for want of prosecution due to lack of appearance by parties. Interim order vacated.
What the court decided
Court No. - 22
Case :- WRIT - B No. - 3236 of 1983
Petitioner :- Phirtoo Respondent :- Dy D.C. Counsel for Petitioner :- Chandra Prakash Counsel for Respondent :- S.C.,S.C.Tripathi
Hon'ble Salil Kumar Rai,J.
List has been revised.
No one appeared either for the petitioner or the respondents.
The writ petition is dismissed for want of prosecution.
Interim order, if any, stands vacated.
Order Date :- 23.1.2019 Satyam
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Phirtoo
- respondent
Dy D.C.
Coram
Salil Kumar Rai
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Allahabad HC
- Decided on
- · January
- Registered
- Case no.
- WRIB/3236/1983
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court