Shrikant Mishra Vs Settlement Officer Consolidation and 8 Others

Court No. - 49

Case :- WRIT - B No. - 3161 of 2019

Petitioner :- Shrikant Mishra Respondent :- Settlement Officer Consolidation And 8 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Juned Alam Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.

¶4

Hon'ble Prakash Padia,J.

¶5

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner. Learned Standing Counsel accepted notice on behalf of respondent Nos.1 & 2.

¶6

In view of the order proposed to be passed, notices need not go to the respondent Nos.3 to 9.

¶7

The petitioner has preferred the present writ petition with the prayer to issue a mandamus directing the respondent No.1/Settlement Officer of Consolidation Padrauna District Kushi Nagar to decide the Appeal No.1089/1296 of 2016 (Shrikant Mishra and othres Vs. Vishwanath and others) Under Section 11(1) of of U.P. Consolidation of Holdings Act, 1953.

¶8

It is contended by learned counsel for the petitioner that the matter is pending since 2016 but till date no decision has been final taken and prays for expeditious disposal

¶9

Learned Standing Counsel has no objection to the prayer made by petitioner.

¶10

Heard learned counsel for the parties present. With the consent of learned counsel for the parties present, the present writ petition is disposed of at the admission stage itself.

¶11

Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the issue, the present petition stands disposed of finally with a direction to the respondent No.1/Settlement Officer of Consolidation Padrauna District Kushi Nagar to consider and decide the aforesaid appeal in accordance with law expeditiously and preferably

¶12

within a period of six months from the date of production of certified copy of this order but certainly after giving opportunity to the parties concerned and without granting unnecessary adjournments to either of the parties.

¶13

Order Date :- 20.12.2019 saqlain

Shrikant Mishra v. Settlement Officer Consolidation and 8 Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Shrikant Mishra v. Settlement Officer Consolidation and 8 Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Mahadeo Vs D.D.C.

Radhey Shyam and 4 Others Vs State of U.P. and 3 Others

Sunahari Lal and Another Vs Bhagwan Devi and 7 Others

Seeta Ram and 8 Others Vs State of U.P. and 3 Others

Phoolwati and Another Vs State of U.P. and 2 Others

Bhullan and 4 Others Vs State of U.P. and 2 Others