Gopal Krishna Pandey v. Settlement Officer of Consolidation Mau
Case brief
What is this about?
The court disposed of a writ petition seeking direction to the Settlement Officer to decide a pending restoration application expeditiously, directing a decision on a fixed date or within two months thereafter.
What did the court decide?
Directed the respondent to decide the pending restoration application expeditiously, preferably on 21.12.2019 or within two months thereafter.
What the court decided
Court No. - 49
Case :- WRIT - B No. - 2768 of 2019
Petitioner :- Gopal Krishna Pandey Respondent :- Settlement Officer Of Consolidation Mau Counsel for Petitioner :- In Person Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.
Hon'ble Prakash Padia,J.
On 22.11.2019 following order was passed:-
"Petitioner Gopal Krishna Pandey appear in person. Learned Standing Counsel accepted notice on behalf of respondent.
The petitioner has preferred the present writ petition with the following prayers:-
"(a) Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus directing the respondent (Settlement Officer of Consolidation, Mau) to decide the Restoration Application filed in Case No.325 of 2011 under Section 42 Z.A. & L.R. Act for correction of Map with regard to Arazi No.23 Part- Chak No.434 Mauza Indara, Pargana-Ghosi, Tehsil Sadar, District Mau wihtin stipulated period pending in his court since 19.2.2013 so that the the justice may be done; otherwise the applicant/petitioner shall suffer irreparable loss and injury.
(b) Issue any other writ, order or direction, as this Hon'ble Court may deem fit and proper under the facts and circumstance of the case.
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the Settlement Officer should decide a pending restoration application expediently to prevent irreparable loss to the petitioner.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Gopal Krishna Pandey
- respondent
Settlement Officer of Consolidation Mau
Coram
Prakash Padia
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Allahabad HC
- Decided on
- · December
- Registered
- Case no.
- WRIB/2768/2019
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court