The petitioner is Chakdar No. 227 and was proposed three chaks by the Assistant Consolidation Officer (hereinafter referred to as, 'A.C.O.'), which were allotted on his original holdings, i.e., Plot Nos. 232, 237 and 146. The petitioner filed objections before the Consolidation Officer (hereinafter referred to as, 'C.O.') praying that in place of chaks proposed by the A.C.O. on Plot Nos. 232 and 146 he may be allotted chaks on Plot Nos. 50 and 51 which were also part of his original holdings. The C.O. vide his order dated 26.12.1990 dismissed the objection of the petitioner on the ground that the petitioner had already been allotted chaks on his original holdings and chaks on Plot Nos. 50 and 51 had been allotted to respondent Nos. 4 to 6, who were also original tenure holders of Plot Nos. 50 and 51. Aggrieved by the order dated 26.12.1990 passed by the C.O., the petitioner filed Appeal No. 111 before the Settlement Officer of Consolidation (hereinafter referred to as, 'S.O.C.') under Section 21(2) of the U.P. Consolidation of Holdings Act, 1953 (hereinafter referred to as, 'Act, 1953'), which was partly allowed by the S.O.C., but the petitioner was still not allotted a chak on Plot Nos. 50 and 51. However, the chaks between the petitioner and respondent Nos. 4 to 6 were rearranged by the S.O.C. vide his order dated 20.7.1991. Aggrieved by the order dated 20.7.1991
