The writ petition was dismissed for want of prosecution as the petitioner was absent. Any interim order stands vacated.
Petition dismissed for want of prosecution; interim order vacated.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 3
Case :- WRIT - A No. - 9518 of 2006
Petitioner :- Smt. Asha S. Nelson Respondent :- State of U.P. and Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Radha Kant Ojha,Satyanshu Ojha Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.
Hon'ble Saral Srivastava,J.
List has been revised.
No one is present on behalf of the petitioner to press the petition.
The writ petition is dismissed for want of prosecution.
Interim order, if any, stands vacated.
Order Date :- 28.11.2019
Manish Tripathi
Smt. Asha S. Nelson
State of U.P.
Saral Srivastava
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
