Writ petition was dismissed for want of prosecution due to the absence of the petitioner's counsel on the date of hearing.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 3
Case :- WRIT - A No. - 10859 of 2006
Petitioner :- Devendra Singh Respondent :- State of U.P. and Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Sudhakar Pandey,A.K. Rai Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Ramesh Singh
Hon'ble Saral Srivastava,J.
List has been revised.
No one is present on behalf of the petitioner to press the petition.
The writ petition is dismissed for want of prosecution.
Interim order, if any, stands vacated.
Order Date :- 28.11.2019
Manish Tripathi
Devendra Singh
State of U.P.
Saral Srivastava
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
