Disposed

Suman Lata v. State of U P and Another

Allahabad HC4 Jun 2019WRIA/9483/2019

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Court disposed of the writ petition without expressing opinion on merits. It directed the petitioner to submit a representation and bank draft to the Examination Regulatory Authority within two weeks, who must then decide within three weeks.

What did the court decide?

Directed petitioner to submit representation and bank draft to Respondent 2 within two weeks for them to decide within three weeks.

Suman Lata Vs State of U P and Another — Education and Admissions | Allahabad HC (2019)

¶1

Court No. - 32

¶2

Case :- WRIT - A No. - 9483 of 2019

¶3

Petitioner :- Suman Lata Respondent :- State Of U P And Another Counsel for Petitioner :- Mohd. Monis Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.

¶4

Hon'ble Prakash Padia,J.

¶5

Heard Sri Mohd. Monis, learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri S.K. Pandey, learned counsel appearing for respondents no. 1 and 2.

¶6

The petitioner has preferred the present writ petition with the following reliefs-

¶7

i) To issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding and directing the respondent no. 2 to decide the representation of the petitioner (Annexure no. 4 to this writ petition).

¶8

ii) To issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding and directing the respondent no. 2 to provide scan copy of the answer book of the petitioner.

¶9

It is contended by learned counsel for the petitioner that in order to obtain scanned copy of the answer sheet a representation was submitted by him addressed to the Secretary,Examination Regulatory Authority, Allenganj, U.P. Prayagraj and the petitioner tried to serve a copy of the same upon the aforesaid authority alongwith demand draft of Rs.2000/- but the officials of the aforesaid authority refused to accept the same.

¶10

Learned counsel for the petitioner relied upon the judgment of this Court dated 20.5.2019 given in Writ A No.8056 of 2019 (Vijay Kumar and 5 others Vs. State of U.P. and another).

¶11

In view of the same petitioner is also entitled for the same relief.

¶12

Heard learned counsel for the parties.

¶13

With the consent of the learned counsel for the parties this writ petition is being disposed of finally at the admission stage itself.

¶14

In the facts and circumstances of the case and in the interest of justice, the petitioners are directed to submit a copy of the representation along with original bank draft of Rs.2000/-, and

¶15

a certified copy of this order, before the respondent no. 2- Secretary, Examination Regulatory Authority, U.P. Alleganj, Prayagraj within a period of two weeks from today. If such a representation is made, the respondent no. 2 is directed to pass appropriate order in accordance with law within a period of three weeks thereafter.

¶16

With the aforesaid observations, this writ petition stands disposed of.

¶17

It is made clear that this Court has not expressed any opinion on merits of the case and the authority concern shall pass order independently, in accordance with law.

¶18

Order Date :- 4.6.2019 M.A.Ansari

Suman Lata v. State of U P and Another

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Suman Lata v. State of U P and Another

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Smt. Priti Vs State of U P and 3 Others

Smt. Smit Tiwari Vs State of U.P. and 6 Others

Avadesh Yadav Vs State of U.P. and 3 Others

Ravindra Kumar Singh and 5 Others Vs State of U P and 3 Others

Nagendra Singh and Another Vs State of U P and 3 Others

Somesh Chaudhary and 6 Others Vs State of U P and 3 Others