The Single Judge held that the Court lacked territorial jurisdiction to entertain the writ petition and dismissed it on that ground alone.
Petition dismissed for lack of territorial jurisdiction.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 6
Case :- WRIT - A No. - 775 of 2019
Petitioner :- Ketoki Ranjan Nath Respondent :- Union Of India And Another Counsel for Petitioner :- Ashish Jaiswal Counsel for Respondent :- A.S.G.I.
Hon'ble Yashwant Varma,J.
Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Standing Counsel.
From a reading of the reliefs as framed and claimed by the petitioner, it is clear that this Court lacks territorial jurisdiction to entertain this petition.
The petition is consequently dismissed on the ground of lack of territorial jurisdiction.
Order Date :- 18.1.2019 Arun K. Singh
(Yashwant Varma, J.)
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the Court had territorial jurisdiction to entertain the writ petition.
Ketoki Ranjan Nath
Union Of India
Yashwant Varma
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
