The High Court dismissed this criminal miscellaneous writ petition called in revise for non-appearance of counsel for the petitioners. The interim order, if any, was vacated.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 34
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 22569 of 2018
Petitioner :- Seema Devi And Another Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 2 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Rakesh Tripathi I Counsel for Respondent :- G.A.,Yogendra Pratap Singh
Hon'ble Sudhir Agarwal,J. Hon'ble Rajeev Misra,J.
Learned A.G.A. is present for State.
Order Date :- 4.12.2019 AK
Seema Devi
Another
State Of U.P.
Sudhir Agarwal
Rajeev Misra
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
