The petitioner failed to appear despite the case being called in the revised list. The High Court dismissed the writ petition for want of prosecution and vacated any interim order.
Writ petition dismissed for want of prosecution; interim order vacated.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 3
Case :- WRIT - A No. - 62444 of 2006
Petitioner :- Rama Nand Chaudhary And Others Respondent :- State of U.P. and Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Ramesh Chandra Mishra,Santosh Kumar Srivastava
Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.
Hon'ble Saral Srivastava,J.
None for the petitioners even when the case is called in revised list.
The writ petition is dismissed for want of prosecution.
Interim order, if any, stands vacated.
Order Date :- 19.11.2019 S.Sharma
Rama Nand Chaudhary And Others
State of U.P.
Saral Srivastava
S. Sharma
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
