In this revision petition, the High Court dismissed the matter as infructuous due to absence of the petitioner and no appearance to press the petition, vacating any interim order.
Matter dismissed, interim order if any stands vacated.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 34
Case :- WRIT - A No. - 48541 of 2011
Petitioner :- Dr. Jai Pal Singh Parihar Respondent :- State of U.P. and Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Manu Khare,Manoj Goswami,Prabhakar Awasthi,Rohit Khare,Rohit Upadhyay Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,A.K.Gupta,Ashish Kumar Singh,M.N. Singh,Mritinjay Pandey,Neeraj Tripathi,Pankaj Kumar Govil,Puneet Khare,S.K. Singh,S.Khare,Sanjay Singh,Siddharth Shukla
Hon'ble Sudhir Agarwal,J. Hon'ble Rajeev Misra,J.
Order Date :- 11.12.2019 Arshad
Dr. Jai Pal Singh Parihar
State of U.P.
Sudhir Agarwal
Rajeev Misra
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
