Contemned writ petition was disposed without hearing as counsel for the petitioner was absent. A bench held that the cause of action no longer survives or the matter has become infructuous.
The writ petition was dismissed. Any interim order, if any, stood vacated.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 34
Case :- WRIT - A No. - 4732 of 2010
Petitioner :- Ashok Kumar Yadav Respondent :- State of U.P. and Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Prabhat Kumar Singh,Lal Sahab Yadav Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Amit Sthalekar,Gautam Baghel,Nisheeth Yadav,Pushpendra Singh
Hon'ble Sudhir Agarwal,J. Hon'ble Rajeev Misra,J.
Order Date :- 11.12.2019 PS
Ashok Kumar Yadav
State of U.P.
Sudhir Agarwal
Rajeev Misra
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
