Santosh Kumar v. State of U.P. and Others
Case brief
What is this about?
Writ petition dismissed for want of prosecution due to petitioner's absence despite repeated calls. Interim order discharged.
Writ petition dismissed for want of prosecution due to petitioner's absence despite repeated calls. Interim order discharged.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 38
Case :- WRIT - A No. - 46746 of 2006
Petitioner :- Santosh Kumar Respondent :- State Of U.P. And Others Counsel for Petitioner :- R.M. Vishwakaarma Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.
Hon'ble Ashwani Kumar Mishra,J.
List has been revised.
Despite repeated calls, none is present on behalf of the petitioner to press this petition.
Writ petition is dismissed for want of prosecution.
Interim order, if any, stands discharged.
Order Date :- 17.7.2019 Ranjeet Sahu
Santosh Kumar
State Of U.P.
Ashwani Kumar Mishra
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court