Petitioner failed to appear despite repeated calls. The single-judge bench dismissed the writ petition for want of prosecution and discharged any interim order.
Petition dismissed for want of prosecution; interim order discharged.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 38
Case :- WRIT - A No. - 14524 of 2006
Petitioner :- Subhash Yadav Respondent :- State Of U.P. And Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Niraj Tiwari,Rohit Tiwari Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Anuj Kumar
Hon'ble Ashwani Kumar Mishra,J.
List has been revised.
Despite repeated calls, none is present on behalf of the petitioner to press this petition. Sri Sujeet Kumar Rai, learned counsel for the respondents is present.
Writ petition is dismissed for want of prosecution.
Interim order, if any, stands discharged.
Order Date :- 17.7.2019 Ranjeet Sahu
Subhash Yadav
State Of U.P.
Ashwani Kumar Mishra
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
