This writ petition concerned the petitioner's grievance over a pending representation. The single bench directioned the respondent authority to consider and decide the matter via a reasoned order within four months.
Direction to respondent no.2 to consider and decide the pending representation by a reasoned order within four months.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 28
Case :- WRIT - A No. - 4655 of 2019
Petitioner :- Karan Singh And 19 Others Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 3 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Rajendra Prasad Tiwari,Vimlesh Kumar Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.
Hon'ble Rohit Ranjan Agarwal,J.
Learned counsel for the petitioner is permitted to correct the array of the parties.
Heard Sri Rajendra Prasad Tiwari, learned counsel for the petitioner and learned standing counsel for respondent nos.1 and 2 and Sri G.D.Mishra for respondent nos.3 and 4.
The sole grievance of the petitioner is that his representation dated 11.4.2017 is pending consideration before respondent no.2.
In view of the above, the writ petition is disposed of with a direction to respondent no.2 to consider and decide the representation of the petitioner by a reasoned and speaking order expeditiously, preferably within four months from the date of production of a certified copy of this order.
Order Date :- 29.3.2019 AKJ
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the petitioner's pending representation dated 11.4.2017 be considered and decided expeditiously by the respondent authority.
Karan Singh And 19 Others
State Of U.P. And 3 Others
Rohit Ranjan Agarwal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
