No appearance from petitioner on revision; counsel for respondents present. Court held petition frustratrous or cause of action expired and dismissed it.
Petition dismissed; interim order vacated.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 34
Case :- WRIT - A No. - 43542 of 2005
Petitioner :- Pramod Kumar Respondent :- State of U.P. and Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Viqar Ahmad Ansari,Ashok Khare Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,K.R. Sirohi,Madhav Jain, Pooja Agarwal
Hon'ble Sudhir Agarwal,J. Hon'ble Rajeev Misra,J.
Pramod Kumar
State of U.P.
Sudhir Agarwal
Rajeev Misra
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
