A writ petition invited under Article 226 of the Constitution of India was dismissed as neither pressed by the petitioner nor pursued by them. The court held that the cause of action may no longer survive or the matter may be infructuous due to lack of interest. Any interim order was vacated.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 34
Case :- WRIT - A No. - 39429 of 2005
Petitioner :- Sattay Ram Singh Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru D.M. Badaun And Others Counsel for Petitioner :- M.P.Singh Gaur Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Shamim Ahmad
Hon'ble Sudhir Agarwal,J.
Order Date :- 18.11.2019 Siddhant Sahu
Sattay Ram Singh
State Of U.P. Thru D.M. Badaun And Others
Sudhir Agarwal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
