The single judge dismissed a writ petition held infructuous due to the outcome of a connected writ petition (WP No. 10600 of 1992) declaring the appointment illegal, vacating any interim order.
None; petition dismissed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 34
Case :- WRIT - A No. - 35049 of 1992
Petitioner :- Jagdish Upadhaya Respondent :- District Inspector of Schools and Others Counsel for Petitioner :- R.C.Dwivedi Counsel for Respondent :- S.C.,Anup Dhar Dubey,J.P.Singh,Nisheeth Yadav
Hon'ble Sudhir Agarwal,J.
Order Date :- 18.11.2019 AK
Jagdish Upadhaya
District Inspector of Schools and Others
Sudhir Agarwal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
