A writ petition challenging reservation results in the Uttar Pradesh Civil Court Staff Centralised Recruitment 2016 was dismissed. Respondents clarified that no non-domicile candidates received reservation benefits.
The writ petition was dismissed finding no merit in the allegations regarding reservation.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 6
Case :- WRIT - A No. - 3810 of 2019
Petitioner :- Nirendra Singh Respondent :- High Court Of Judicature At Allahabad And Another
Counsel for Petitioner :- Dr. Akhilesh Kumar Counsel for Respondent :- Manish Goyal,Ashish Mishra
Hon'ble Yashwant Varma,J.
None has appeared for the petitioner. Sri Ashish Mishra learned counsel for the respondents is present.
The Court is constrained to note that even on the last occasion, no one had appeared to press this petition.
This petition has questioned the results which were declared by the respondents in respect of the Uttar Pradesh Civil Court Staff Centralised Recruitment 2016. The allegation is that various candidates who were not domiciled in the State of U.P. were granted the benefits of reservation. Sri Mishra on instructions states that this allegation is patently incorrect since no person not domiciled in the State has been granted the benefits of reservation. According to Sri Mishra the candidates of whom reference is made in the writ petition were treated as general candidates since they were not domiciled in the State of U.P.
In view of the above, the Court finds no merit in the writ petition which shall stand dismissed .
Order Date :- 29.4.2019 faraz
1 issue framed by the court
Whether reservation benefits were wrongly granted to candidates not domiciled in Uttar Pradesh.
Nirendra Singh
High Court Of Judicature At Allahabad
Yashwant Varma
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
