The writ petition was dismissed for want of prosecution as the petitioner did not appear even in the revised call. No substantive issue was determined.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 6
Case :- WRIT - A No. - 2413 of 2019 Petitioner :- Awdhesh Sonker Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 5 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Dinesh Pathak Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Dinesh Pathak
Hon'ble Yashwant Varma,J.
None has appeared for the petitioner even in the revised call. The writ petition is consequently dismissed for want of prosecution.
Order Date :- 26.4.2019/faraz
Awdhesh Sonker
State Of U.P.
Yashwant Varma
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
