The Court dismissed the present writ petition challenging the Tribunal's order directing pay protection for the respondent-claimant, noting no error as the respondent had already retired.
The writ petition was dismissed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 34
Case :- WRIT - A No. - 2965 of 2002 Petitioner :- Union Of India Thru G.M. Northern Rly. New Delhi And Ors.
Respondent :- Swami Nath Lal And Another Counsel for Petitioner :- Govind Saran,P.K. Srivastava,Praveen Kr. Srivastava
Counsel for Respondent :- S.S. Sharma,S.C.
Hon'ble Sudhir Agarwal,J. Hon'ble Rajeev Misra,J.
Order Date :- 19.12.2019 Prajapati
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the Tribunal committed an error apparent on the face of the record by directing protection of pay for an employee who had already retired after superannuation.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Union Of India
Swami Nath Lal
Sudhir Agarwal
Rajeev Misra
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
