The First Appellate Court dismissed the appellant's appeal against the rejection of an application seeking recall of an interim maintenance order under Section 24 of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955, finding no merit due to lack of procedural basis.
Appeal dismissed; application for recall of interim maintenance order was rightly rejected.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 34
Case :- FIRST APPEAL No. - 878 of 2019
Appellant :- Chaudhary Saurabh Kumar Respondent :- Pooja Counsel for Appellant :- Vinod Kumar Tirpathi,Manoj Kumar Tripathi
Hon'ble Sudhir Agarwal,J. Hon'ble Rajeev Misra,J.
Order Date :- 19.12.2019 AK
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the appeal against the rejection of an application for recall/recognition of an interim maintenance order under Section 24 of the Hindu Marriage Act is maintainable under Section 19 of the Fam
2 provisions across 2 enactments
Chaudhary Saurabh Kumar
Pooja
Sudhir Agarwal
Rajeev Misra
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
