The High Court dismissed a revisable writ petition (Writ A No. 28676 of 1995) as infructuous. Noting the absence of the petitioner's counsel and the belief that the petition has become dead, the court rejected the matter without deciding merits and vacated any interim order.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 34
Case :- WRIT - A No. - 28676 of 1995 Petitioner :- Rajendra Prasad Gupta Respondent :- D.I.O.S. Bulandshahar And 5 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- R.K. Jain Counsel for Respondent :- S.C.,Vinod Sinha
Hon'ble Sudhir Agarwal,J.
Order Date :- 14.10.2019 Ravi Prakash
Rajendra Prasad Gupta
D.I.O.S. Bulandshahar
Sudhir Agarwal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
