Bail application filed by accused Santosh challenging his custody in a rape case involving Section 376 IPC and Section 4 POCSO. The court found the rape allegation consistent despite contradictions in the victim's statement and denied bail, holding it was not a fit case.
Bail application dismissed; accused remains in custody.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 34
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 36296 of 2016
Applicant :- Santosh Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. Counsel for Applicant :- Santosh Kumar Yadav Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.,Manoj Kumar Srivastava
Hon'ble Sudhir Agarwal,J.
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the accused is entitled to bail in a rape case involving the POCSO Act.
Whether contradictions in the victim's statement vitiate the alleged offence.
2 provisions across 2 enactments
Santosh
Sudhir Agarwal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
