Smt. Yashoda Rani v. State of U.P. and Another
Case brief
What is this about?
A written application was called on record, but the petitioner was absent. The court observed the matter was likely infructuous and dismissed the petition.
A written application was called on record, but the petitioner was absent. The court observed the matter was likely infructuous and dismissed the petition.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 34
Case :- WRIT - A No. - 27728 of 2009
Petitioner :- Smt. Yashoda Rani Respondent :- State of U.P. and Another Counsel for Petitioner :- Akhilesh Kumar Singh Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.
Hon'ble Sudhir Agarwal,J. Hon'ble Rajeev Misra,J.
Order Date :- 17.12.2019 Arshad
Smt. Yashoda Rani
State of U.P.
Another
Sudhir Agarwal
Rajeev Misra
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court