A revive petition tube 26629 of 2009 was dismissed as infructuous due to the absence of the petitioner's counsel, with no cause of action surviving.
Petition dismissed; interim order vacated.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 34
Case :- WRIT - A No. - 26629 of 2009
Petitioner :- Naresh Kumar Bhati Respondent :- State of U.P. and Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Amar Jeet Singh Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Samir Sharma,Sunil Kumar Misra
Hon'ble Sudhir Agarwal,J. Hon'ble Rajeev Misra,J.
Order Date :- 17.12.2019 Arshad
Naresh Kumar Bhati
State of U.P.
Sudhir Agarwal
Rajeev Misra
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
