Anurag Anand v. State of U.P. and 2 Others
Case brief
What is this about?
Writ petition for appointment on compassionate grounds rendered infructuous; dismissed.
Writ petition for appointment on compassionate grounds rendered infructuous; dismissed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 6
Case :- WRIT - A No. - 20883 of 2016
Petitioner :- Anurag Anand Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 2 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Girish Kumar Gupta Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.
Hon'ble Yashwant Varma,J.
Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri J.S. Bundela, the learned Standing Counsel for the State-respondents.
This petition has been preferred for consideration of the appointment of the petitioner on compassionate basis. Learned Standing Counsel has produced before the Court an order dated 30 January 2012 and points out that the claim of the petitioner has already been rejected. A copy of the said order has been handed over to the learned counsel for the petitioner.
In view of the subsequent developments which have been pointed out, this writ petition is rendered infructuous.
It is accordingly dismissed as such.
Order Date :- 20.2.2019 Arun K. Singh
(Yashwant Varma, J.)
Anurag Anand
State Of U.P.
2 Others
Yashwant Varma
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court